Home /Archive /2019 /2019 №11 /2019_11_6

Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2019. (11): 38-44 
https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2019.11.038

I.Yu. Egorov, I.A. Jukovich, V.V. Artiushenko
Center for evaluation of activity of research institutions and scientific support of regional development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine , Kyiv

INTERIM RESULTS AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS OF THE NAS OF UKRAINE

The article deals with the stages of implementation of the “Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of scientific institutions of the NAS of Ukraine”. The developed methodology is intended to provide an objective, open and transparent evaluation of the activities of scientific institutions, and the evaluation results are approved by independent experts on the basis of qualitative analysis covering various aspects of the institution's activities. The interim results of the evaluation of the performance of the NASU institutions are analyzed. It is determined that (as of July 18, 2019) 115 institutions have passed the evaluation procedure with the approval of its results (85.2% of the total number of institutions that are part of NASU). 77.4% of the evaluated institutions were assigned to category "A" (leading institutions in many scientific fields). The authors examined the main problems encountered during the evaluation procedure and suggested possible solutions.
Keywords: scientific institution, evaluation, effectiveness of the activities, Office for evaluation of the activities of scientific institutions, categories of evaluation.

Language of article: ukrainian

Full text (PDF)

REFERENCES

  1. Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific institutions of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. http://www.nas.gov.ua/text/pdfNews/metodyka_text.pdf
  2. Leibniz Gemeinschaft. Quality assurance by Scientific Advisory Boards at Leibnizinstitutions. http://www.leibniz-gemeinschaft.de/en/about-us/evaluation/quality-assurance-by-scientific-advisory-boards-at-leibniz-institutions/
  3. Hicks D., Wouters P., Waltman L., deRijcke S., Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015. 520(7548): 429. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/520429a
  4. Background Report Peer Review of the Ukrainian Research and Innovation. Directorate-General for Research & Innovation Directorate A — Policy Development and Coordination. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. https://blacksea-horizon.eu/object/document/1016/attach/KI_AX_16_008_EN_N_UKR_0.pdf
  5. Resolution of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 17.05.2017. No. 134. http://www.nas.gov.ua/legaltexts/Pages/regulation.aspx?ffn1=ActID&fft1=Eq&ffv1=P-170517-134
  6. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine 19.07.2017 No. 540. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/540-2017-%D0%BF https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC90013A
  7. Resolution of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 12.06.2019. No. 169. https://isp.kiev.ua/images/News/Audit_2019/%20169.pdf 
  8. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine 22.08.2018 No. 641. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/641-2018-%D0%BF
  9. Egorov I. Who “made a suit” and who needs it? Some discussions about the next study of the state and prospects of the development of science in Ukraine. Dzerkalo Tyzhnya. July, 27 — August, 16. 2019. No. 29. https://dt.ua/SCIENCE/hto-poshiv-kostyum-i-komu-ce-potribno-318710_.html