Home /Archive /2019 /2019 №7 /2019_7_7

Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2019. (7):36-44
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2019.07.036

M.A. Khvesyk
Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-4904

H.O. Obikhod
Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6803

NATURAL RESOURCE OF UKRAINE: STATE AND METHODS OF CONSERVATION

According to the results of the research conducted on the current state of the natural resource sphere, as well as in determining the priorities and organizational and economic mechanisms for its preservation, the heterogeneity of regional development is established according to relevant indicators. For the first time, using innovative methodology, the value of the natural wealth of the country is determined. Indications and structure of the organizational, economic and institutional mechanisms of the integrated economic assessment of the natural wealth of territories in the process of balancing the natural resources use and effective management of sustainable development of the state are revealed. The use of public-private partnership in the field of nature use is described, and the basic implementational principles of this model have been represented at the regional and local levels. This requires the development of special, rather than unified, approaches to building up the socio-economic potential of individual territories. In this context, an assessment of the resource potential of the natural wealth of Ukraine is carried out. It includes land, forest, water and mineral resources, as well as ecosystem services. The level of provision of regions with the main groups of natural resources is determined and the degree of their economic use is assessed. The priority directions for increasing the value of available territorial resources, their use in financial turnover are proposed and justified. The necessity of organizing an appropriate management system, which would provide financial instruments for resource management and, on the other hand, would guarantee their effective passage through an adequate financial infrastructure and at the same time expand the possibilities for enhancing the process of their reproduction is shown.

Keywords: natural resources, capitalization, institutionalization, land, water and forest resources, ecosystem services, environmental security, sustainable development, organizational and financial mechanisms.

 Language of article: ukrainian

REFERENCES

  1. Khvesyk M.A. Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannya: vektory rozvytku (Environmental economics: development vector). Kyiv, 2019.
  2. Pyrozhkov S.I., Khvesyk M.A. (eds.) Ekonomichna otsinka pryrodnoho bahatstva Ukrainy (Economic assessment of natural wealth of Ukraine). Kyiv, 2015.
  3. Khvesyk M.A. (ed.) Systemni aspekty kapitalizatsii pryrodnykh resursiv (System aspects of capitalization of natural resources). Kyiv, 2013.
  4. Khvesyk M.A. (ed.) Vodni resursy u vymirakh pryrodnoho bahatstva Ukrainy (Water resources in terms of natural wealth of Ukraine). Kyiv, 2016
  5. Mandzyk V.M. Kapitalizatsiya vodnykh resursiv: teoriya i praktyka (Capitalization of Water Resources: Theory and Practice). Kyiv: ProfKnyga, 2018.
  6. Sakal V.О. Instytutsionalni transformatsii u sferi zemlekorystuvannya (Institutional transformations in land use). Kyiv: ProfKnyga, 2018.
  7. Ibatullin Sh.I., Khvesyk M.A., Dorosh I.M. Stan ta perspektyvy kapitalizatsii zemelnykh resursiv rehionu v konteksti staloho rozvytku Ukrainy (Status and prospects of capitalization of land resources of the region in the context of sustainable development of Ukraine). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2014.
  8. Sepanenko A.V., Obykhod H.O., Omelchenko A.A. et al. Ekolohichna modernizatsiya v systemi pryrodno-tekhnohennoi ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky (Ecological modernization in the system of natural and technoginic and ecological safety). Kyiv, 2016.
  9. Obikhod H., Pylypiv V., Illiashenko І. Institutional principles of balanced nature management in the context of environmental and natural-technogenic safety. Economic Annals-XXI. 2015. (9–10): 98.
  10. Paton B.E. (ed.) Natsionalna paradyhma staloho rozvytku Ukrainy (National Paradigm of Sustainable Development of Ukraine). Kyiv, 2016.
  11. Khvesyk M.A., Obykhod H.O., Bystryakov I.K., Khvesyk Yu.M. Assessment of the safety of environment in the system of sustainable development. Economic Annals-XXI. 2018. 170(3–4): 22. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V170-04
  12. Khvesyk M.A. (ed.) Formuvannya systemy mekhanizmiv upravlinnya pryrodnymy resursamy v umovakh yevrointehratsiynykh protsesiv (Formation of the System of Mechanisms of Management of Natural Resources in the Conditions of European Integration Processes). Kyiv, 2017.
  13. Pryrodni resursy u finansovo-ekonomichnomu zabezpechenni rozvytku obyednanoi terytorialnoi hromady (rekomendatsii dlya mistsevykh lideriv ta kerivnykiv OTH) (Natural resources in the financial and economic provision of the development of the united territorial community (recommendations for local leaders and leaders of the united territorial communities)). Kyiv, 2018.

​Full text (PDF)